Today I'll give you some time to finish your precise on "Shooting An Elephant" and then we will look at "Why We Crave Horror Stories" by Stephen King. First let's discuss Assata and then look at the rhetorical question.
https://apcentral.collegeboard.org/media/pdf/ap25-frq-english-language-set-1.pdf
HW: Assata & AP Classroom.
^^^^ The Rhetorical Triangle (Aristotle)
What in the World is Rhetoric???
Well, according to the book, rhetoric
is "a thoughtful, reflective activity leading to effective
communication, including rational exchange of opposing viewpoints." This
to me sounds like the act of opening your mouth and conversing, or
perhaps, debating with someone.
KEY ELEMENTS:
-Context
The
context is the occasion that the essay/speech was given. This can be
somewhat like the setting of a story, and by knowing this, you can
properly assess who the intended audience is and whether or not the
context increases the effectivity of the piece.
-Purpose
The goal
that the speaker/writer/author wanted to achieve. This coincides with
the context and allows the writer to choose the best possible audience
in which to present the piece.
-Thesis/claim/assertion
This could be the
-Subject
What the
piece is about, the topic, y'know... so the author should have a very
good grasp on what he/she/it wants to talk about in order to express the
ideas/comments thoroughly and with as much consistency as possible.
Ethos:
Ethos is the character of the writer or the speaker. Good ethos is when
the writer presents his/her/itself as a classy individual while also
coming off as "credible and trustworthy". Allowing the audience to
connect with the author is something that really helps push the point
across and deliver the best results for giving a great speech/rhetoric.
Logos:
Logos
is the appeal to logic/reason, by offering the audience clear and
easy-ro-understand ideas that make as much sense as possible, while
remaining rational. Presenting a main idea in a concise manner, showing
another side/counterargument, credible statistics and facts, and/or
expert testimony. (See "Things Fielding told us to include in Persuasive
Essays.")
Pathos:
Pathos
is the appeal to emotion. While this isn't something that should be
emphasized as it can come off as propaganda which is not what you want.
Appealing to the emotions means using vivid word choice that can easily
stimulate the readers' thoughts and using the first-person perspective.
The Classical Arrangement of Rhetoric:
1. Introduction (exordium)
-Brings
the reader into the discussion, emerging them into the world of
rhetoric. Introductions can be a couple short sentences, or several
lengthy paragraphs (pages...!). Drawing the reader in is important
(hook) and presenting the main idea (thesis statement) and stating the
order of development. Normally, this is where the author would establish
ethos.
2. Narration (narratio)
-Factual
information is presented and background information give the reader
that much more insight into the subject. This is typically when you
would begin to appeal to logos, yet it is smart to consider appealing to
pathos as you are inclined to evoke an emotional response form the
reader so that they can firmly decide on your opinion with the facts and
statements you present.
3. Confirmation (confirmatio)
-A
large portion of the writing that sets up the proof of your argument
and why the audience should agree. The details in this section should be
strong and thorough, while making the biggest appeal to logos in this
section.
4. Refutation (refutatio)
-This
part of the writing takes a look at the other side of the topic, the
counterargument, if you want to call it that. Used as a "bridge between
the writer's proof and conclusion" but also as appeal to ethos, as the
audience can see that you are passionate enough about your subject that
you chose to research both sides to get as informed as possible.
5. Conclusion (peroratio)
-Closing
the essay, appealing to pathos one final time as well as connecting
with ethos set up in the beginning of the piece. Instead of repeating
what has already been said (guilty of this on several occasions... :l ),
the writer's ideas should all get compacted into one and "answers the
question, so what?" The last words are usually the ones that the
audience is going to remember, so make them count. Throw it all out on
the table and sum up the essay with as much intelligence as possible!
Patterns of Development:
Authors
can change their arrangement by writing in order of purpose. Each
method of writing purposefully has its own way of organizing thoughts
and piecing together all the little eccentricities neatly and
professionally.
Types of Essays We'll Be Writing:
Narration: Tells a story and
recounts tales of slaying dragons and mystical creatures. Not really,
but narration is typically a recollection of previous events, usually
chronologically, or as a means to enter into the main idea of an essay.
Description: Much like narration and
just as detailed (if not, more so), but the details focus more on the
sensory responses from the readers. These include, the ways things
taste, the sounds around the writer, textures and feelings, sights,
colours, setting up an atmosphere for the piece. The descriptive
language is a way to help make thoughts more approachable to the readers
and helps in being more persuasive.
Process Analysis: An
explanation. A how-to. The steps on how to achieve something or engage
in a process. These can best be found in (according to the book)
self-help books. Because these are going to help the way someone lives
or acts, you must be as clear as possible in the instruction with
smooth, flowing transitions as to not miss a step or confuse anyone.
Exemplification: Hopefully, this is
readable... Facts, examples, testimonies are all ways to make an idea
complete. With complete ideas, come more acceptable readers and easier
persuasion.
Comparison and Contrast: Highlighting
similarities and differences in an organized fashion allows clear
presentation of points that can be easy to digest for the audience. With
careful analytics, the author can find interesting tidbits of
information that could open up ideas to readers that otherwise couldn't
be achieved, as well as highlighting both sides of an argument or
multiple angles of a topic.
Classification and Division: Sorting
information into how topics go together and why. Connections can be
made between things that are seemingly unrelated and thus, like
Comparison and Contrast, can reveal difference aspects to the reader
that otherwise were unknown.
Definition: Defining something can
allow more points to come through and allow "meaningful conversation".
Example: (See what I'm doing here?) Let's talk about how awesome
alligators are. But before we do this, we must DEFINE what counts as "awesome". Perhaps a dictionary definition.
Cause and Effect: Causes and
Effects. Self explanitory... "The effects that result from a cause is a
powerful foundation for argument." Seems legit.
No comments:
Post a Comment